Elective Title: Clinical English/Spanish Interactive Language Exchange Course UTMB & UDEM | |||
Course Number: BLHU-4003 | |||
Elective Type: career | Duration/Weeks: 11 months | Max Enrollment: 8 | |
Prerequisites: Successful completion of Year 3 | |||
Additional Requirements: C-form required, send forms to Ms. Berengaria Navarre (bcnavarr@utmb.edu) & must be of Intermediate to Advanced Spanish Oral Proficiency. Must test with Dr. Norma A. Perez Raifaisen. (4 weeks of elective credit will be given with satisfactory completion) | |||
Responsible Faculty Director: Norma A. Perez-Raifaisen, MD | Periods Offered: 1 excluding holiday period 8 Offered 100% Online |
||
Coordinator: Berengaria Navarre, MS, MFA | Other Faculty: Soham Al Snih, MD; | ||
Location to Report on First Day: Online |
Goals |
To expose and engage medical students in medical dialogue to improve clinical language during students clinical years longitudinally; 4th years for UTMB and 6th years for UDEM. |
Objectives |
Objective 1: Provide and exchange on clinical cases, current health care policy and reform, from neighboring countries. Objective 2: Familiarize students with main health conditions, treatment and management, lack of or access to healthcare resources, and health policies prevalent among Latino patients from bordering countries. |
Description of course activities |
The US/Mexico border cities and states have shared and continue to share a binational patient population across the health care services due to the proximity. The continued exchange or the continued flow of patients between the two countries has opened a window of opportunity for the academic institutions, the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) and the Universidad de Monterrey (UDEM), to partner and provide an innovative approach to rich and engaging learning among students from both academic institutions. The language exchange virtual sessions provide students the opportunity to utilize the target language with native speakers in a noncritical format and to develop strategies of oral compensation and the significance of negotiations critical in clinical practice. Students will meet twice each period for 10 periods virtually with UDEM MS6 medical students. UTMB - MS4 UDEM - MS6 (undergraduate Intern) Program Layout - 100% virtual sessions -Module 1-9 (1st sessions) -Guest speaker: -Alternate speakers from UDEM and UTMB -Speakers will follow the topics for each module -UTMB will provide Zoom link for both groups to join -The speaker will share 1-2 articles to share with students -Article discussion: -5-minute article presentations will happen in second half of session and presented in tongue of lead school from the students and open for discussion in tongue of other school -Guest speaker engages in live discussion with students or faculty facilitator will moderate the article discussion -Module 1-9 (2nd sessions) Clinical case discussion: -Students from both schools will interact by selecting a clinical case to present -Students will share summary of clinical case in PPT -Documents will be shared to UTMB and stored in Blackboard -The faculty facilitators will moderate the small group discussions mimicking clinical case presentation with interactive dialogue amongst the students -Module 10 (1st session) -75% of the small group share their discussion on reflections. -Students may present in non-native tongue -Module 10 (2nd session) -The remainder of the small group share their discussion on reflections -Students from both schools will work on program evaluation. Modules Calendar -Infectious Disease and COVID -Global Health -Pediatrics -Border & Binational Healthcare/Rural Medicine -Preventive Medicine -Surgery -Geriatrics -Family Medicine -Reflections & Program Evaluation |
Type of students who would benefit from the course |
Students interested in: 1) improving their Spanish clinical oral proficiency discussion; 2) international healthcare discussion; 3) improving their clinical oral presentations; and 4) students pursuing the Bilingual Health Scholarly Concentration |
Weekly Schedule | ||||
Estimated Course Activities (Start-Time/Finish-Time): | ||||
Day of Week | AM | PM | ||
Monday | ||||
Tuesday | ||||
Wednesday | ||||
Thursday | ||||
Friday | ||||
Saturday | ||||
Sunday | ||||
Average number of patients seen per week: None (discuss clinical cases virtually |
||||
Call Schedule: No |
Research / Other Course Activities | |
(estimated schedule) | |
Activity | Hours per Week |
Faculty Contact-Time | 20 |
Self-Directed Study | 10 |
Data-Collection/Analysis | |
Other student contact and preparation hours | 10 |
Method of Student Evaluation | ||
1. Clinical Observation | ||
A. | Where are students observed on this elective? | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
B. | Frequency - How often are students observed clinically? | |
2 hours per session, twice per module, a total of 20 times observed | ||
C. | Format - What method(s) are used to document the student's clinical performance? | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2. Oral Presentation | ||
A. | Audience - To whom does the student present? | |
Dr. Perez | ||
B. | Frequency / Duration of Presentation(s)? | |
no more than 3 minutes at a time | ||
C. | Format - What guidelines are set for the student's presentation? | |
oral presentation | ||
D. | Assessment - Who assesses the student's presentation performance? | |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
E. | Method of content selection | |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
3. Written Assignment (H&P's, notes, papers, abstracts, etc.) | ||
A. | Frequency of written assignment(s)? | |
Clinical Cases Power Point summarizing the clinical case addressing the CC, PHI, PMH, & past & current treatment & management. Manuscript Power Point or Word document summarizing main points of article Reflective Paper Word document of 300 words maximum | ||
B. | Format - What guidelines are set for the student's written work? | |
Clinical Cases Summary in Power Point addressing CC, PHI, PMH & past & current treatment and management. Power Point template will be provided to students Manuscript presentation Power Point template summarizing overview of the article will be provided to students 1. Summarize abstract 2. Summarize methods 3. Summarize results 4. Summarize conclusions 5. Identify weaknesses and strengths c. Reflective paper presentation 1. 1-page, 12 points, New Times Roman or Arial, 300 word essay using APA recommendations Purdue guidelines: Link will be given at time of elective. 2. Will be submitted to each school faculty for review and will be stored in Google Drive 3. References will be required using only current top medical journals | ||
C. | Length of written assignment(s)? | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
D. | Are recent references required? No If yes, how are they selected? | |
E. | Method of content selection - e.g. student-selected, relate to cases, etc.? | |
F. | Audience - Who assesses the student's written performance? | |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
4. Examination | ||
Format | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5. Extra Course Activities | ||
What expectations do you have for the student to demonstrate participation in the elective (e.g. small group activities, seminars, thoughtful questions, providing resources, journal club, resident lecture attendance)? | ||
Active participation in oral interactive dialogue |
6. Additional Costs | ||
Please list any additional costs and/or purchases (books, materials, movies to watch, etc.) that are required for this course. Include an estimated total cost. If there are no additional costs, please enter "None". | ||
None |
7. Other Modes of Evaluation | ||
Please explain below. | ||
None |
8. If this course is an Acting Internship, please complete the following: | ||
A. | Objectives for the AI should relate directly to the Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs).
Each AI should describe how the four key Year-4 EPAs that our school has identified as being Year-4 skills are
assessed. The Year-4 objectives are:
1. Entering and discussing orders/prescriptions.Specify how the student will be given formative feedback on their clinical skills. |
|
B. |
Year-4 students should demonstrate mastery of EPAs they developed in the clerkship year, including recommending and interpreting common diagnostic and screening tests, and performing general procedures of a physician. They should be able to demonstrate masterfully and independently skills they mastered in Years 2-3, including efficiently performing comprehensive admission-notes and succinct daily progress notes and perform accurate, concise, and hypothesis-driven clinical presentations, form clinical questions and retrieve evidence to advance patient care. They should be able to demonstrate basic understanding of and beginning mastery of collaborate as a member of the interprofessional team and identify system failures and contribute to a culture of safety improvement. List advanced clinical skills that a student will be assured an opportunity to practice. |
|
C. |
How specifically will this AI build on developing skills from the clerkship year to prepare students for internship? |
|
D. |
What opportunities will typically be available to all students who take this AI (procedures, required presentations, etc.)? What opportunities may be available based on patient load/presentation or student initiative (ie. Writing a case report)? |
|
E. |
An AI should have expectation of a minimum of 32 hours per week of clinical responsibilities. Duty hours should be capped at ACGME limits for an intern, thus up to 24 hours followed by 4 hours of activities related to patient safety, education, and handoff. Students cannot work more than 80 hours per week averaged over 4 weeks. They can only have 1 day off in a 7-day work week with 8 hours off between shifts. Clinical responsibilities will vary depending on specialty, but how is the student functioning with work commensurate to a PGY1 with an appropriate level of training? |
|
F. |
How is the student demonstrating drawing clinical conclusions and/or developing a management plan and documentation as an intern would do? |
|
G. |
How and by whom will midpoint feedback be provided to the student? How will you remediate deficiencies identified at midpoint? |
|
H. |
Acting Internship students often seek letters of recommendation following their experience. How many different Faculty will work directly with the student and have knowledge of the student's abilities to detail in a written evaluation? Describe the degree of supervision and interaction with faculty vs. residents or other providers and how feedback will be obtained if more direct work is with residents or other providers. |
|